We build custom workflows that reply to every enquiry the moment it lands, qualify it, send a real booking link and file the lead in your CRM — so nothing that reaches you waits in an inbox. Then we write the documentation that lets your team run it without us.
It has to work when someone else runs it. Most automation projects fail quietly — the demo works and production doesn't — so we build for the part that comes after the demo: the handover, the documentation, and the failure that happens at 2am.
A lead that waits is a lead that bought somewhere else. We build the workflow that catches it — reply, qualification, booking and CRM record, without a human in the loop until the moment a human should be.
Documentation is the difference between a tool people adopt and a tool they abandon. We write the docs, tutorials and case studies your product is judged by — tested against a real terminal, not imagined in a brief.
Every claim on this page has a working artefact behind it: the agent stacks and lead workflows we build, and the published technical writing that documents them. Everything below can be checked rather than taken on trust.
Documented build by build in the samples below: a local model runtime, a validation gate in front of every tool call it makes, and a review step before anything irreversible can run.
The same stack pointed at the commercial problem: the enquiry that lands at 11pm and still gets an answer, a qualification and a calendar slot before anyone opens their inbox in the morning.
I'm Dany Chausse. I spent five years building and maintaining technical systems where you find out whether the work was correct by testing it, not by looking at it.
That work trains one specific habit: you don't call a system working because it looks right. You test it, you record the result, and you put your name on it. It's also why I care about the boring half of automation — the runbook, the failure path, the handover document nobody reads until the day they desperately need it.
In practice: I build local AI agent stacks on models I run myself, so a client's data never has to leave the building to get the benefit. And I write technical documentation that ships with the code it describes and the terminal output it actually captured.
One call, no pitch deck. Bring the funnel that leaks or the documentation nobody can follow, and I'll tell you plainly whether it is worth building.
dany@chausseconsulting.com